The EU Coalition Explorer presents the results of the EU27 Survey conducted by the European Council on Foreign Relations in the 27 member states of the European Union. It illustrates the expert opinions of more than 800 respondents who work on European policy in governments, think-tanks, academia, the media, and elsewhere. The Coalition Explorer creates a visual understanding of the views held by Europe’s professional political class – information that otherwise is not available to policymakers or the public.
Across 20 policy areas, the EU Coalition Explorer shows the potential for future coalition building between EU member states. The interactive tool can be used to locate the EU’s political centre – or centres – from which a more capable and cohesive European Union can be built.
The 2020 edition of the EU27 Survey ran from 11 March to 28 April 2020. The EU Coalition Explorer 2020 was published on 8 July 2020.
The EU Coalition Explorer is an interactive tool for exploring coalition building in the European Union. It illustrates the results of ECFR’s EU27 Survey of more than 800 professionals who work on European policy in governments, think-tanks, academia, the media, and elsewhere. It is an open resource to explore the survey results for the EU as a whole and for individual member states.
The 2020 edition of the EU Coalition Explorer has four main chapters: Preferences, Actor Level, Priorities, and Partners. Additional sections present the results of a supplemental expert survey on European cooperation in the coronavirus crisis and more detailed information on national policy intentions collected by ECFR’s associate researchers.
Whereas previous versions of the EU Coalition Explorer were presented in PDF format, the 2020 edition has been created as an interactive online tool using Tableau. The menu along the top of the tool displays the explorer’s central chapters. By clicking on the titles, you can jump directly to any of the chapters. Within each chapter, additional menus allow for sorting the information by question, policy area, country, and other variables. Tooltips provide additional information on individual data points.
Europe’s capacity to act collectively has become an increasingly critical issue as both the importance of intergovernmental decision-making and the level of political fragmentation have grown over recent years. Against this backdrop, a debate has started in member state capitals and the EU at large as to how the union can evolve and move forward. The surveys and the presentation of their results aim to inform the debate on how a more capable and cohesive EU can be built.
A multi-speed Europe of differentiated integration with a progressive core and an associated periphery could serve as a template for future cooperation and solidarity within the EU and Europe at large. One could also imagine multiple, sometimes overlapping, coalitions of the willing for deeper integration in particular policy areas, with others prioritising different areas for closer cooperation. With our survey and the EU Coalition Explorer we aim to present the coalition potential of EU member states – both for coalitions that have visibly shaped European policy in the past and for those that may have been overlooked due to lack of data and accessible visualisation.
The label “expert” is intentionally used to describe our survey. In contrast to public opinion polls with national representative samples, this survey aims to capture the views and insights of policy professionals. In the debate on the future of Europe, the views of Europe’s political class – the professionals inside and outside government who work directly on policy or follow politics as expert observers – are central to understanding the dynamics that shape cooperation in the EU. The EU27 Survey and EU Coalition Explorer therefore complement ECFR’s public opinion research, the Unlock project.
The 2020 edition of the EU Coalition Explorer is accompanied by a mapping of the EU’s 27 national governments’ preferred policy outcomes across 20 policy areas. It complements the results of the expert survey. For example, while the Coalition Explorer documents whom policy professionals consider their key partners in particular policy areas, the Policy Intentions Mapping provides a reality check on whether preferences align in substance.
The Coronavirus Special presents the results of a supplemental EU27 expert survey on European cooperation in the coronavirus crisis, which ran from 4 to 25 May 2020. The goal of this survey was to provide a glimpse into what happened to European cooperation as the pandemic reached its height. As a case study of European cooperation, the Coronavirus Special provides a reality check to the data collected in the Coalition Explorer 2020 and should be treated as a complementary tool.
The EU27 Survey and the supplemental survey on the coronavirus crisis were conducted through anonymous online questionnaires in which every question was mandatory to complete the survey. The invitations were sent by email to foreign ministries, government and parliament offices, think-tanks, research institutions, journalists, and other organisations working on European policy. Upon our request, a number of recipient institutions and individuals distributed the invitation within their professional networks or departments.
The 2020 edition of the EU27 Survey ran from 11 March to 28 April 2020 and comprised 15 individual questions. A total of 845 respondents answered at least the first substantive survey question. Of those, 684 participants completed the questionnaire. The distribution of respondents across EU member states, professional backgrounds, and areas of expertise can be viewed in the tool under “Survey Info”. All results displayed in the EU Coalition Explorer are based on the total number of responses to that respective question.
The Coronavirus Special of the EU27 Survey ran from 4 to 25 May 2020 and 7 individual questions. A total of 744 respondents answered at least the first substantive survey question. Of those, 677 participants completed the questionnaire. The
Research on national policy intentions across 20 policy areas was conducted by ECFR’s associate researchers between 9 March and 27 May 2020. The results are based on interviews with experts and policy professionals as well as on reviews of primary sources, such as government documents and party manifestos.
Jana Puglierin, Ulrike Franke - 14 August 2020
The EU Coalition Explorer survey reveals the importance of Germany and France within the EU, and the impact they can have when they cooperate with each other.
Pawel Zerka - 8 July 2020
ECFR research into how EU member states and institutions worked together at the height of covid-19 confirms Germany was the bloc’s undisputed crisis leader
Survey of experts in 28 capitals illuminates the complex network of relationships among EU member states.
Lithuania’s pandemic: The power of regional cooperation. By Justinas Mickus
The Swede spot: Why Stockholm needs flexible coalitions. By Pawel Zerka
Why Germany lost its way on climate policy. By Claire Busse & Rafael Loss
The provincial German-Polish relationship. By Piotr Buras
How Germany could break the migration deadlock. By Clara Sophie Cramer
How the frugal four could grow in number and influence by Catharina Sørensen
Podcast: Where there's a will, there's a way: France, Germany and EU coalition building, with Ulrike Franke & Pawel Zerka
Why Finland never joined the frugal four. By Hanna Ojanen
Poland in the EU: How to lose friends and alienate people. By Pawel Zerka
Beware of mission-accomplished syndrome: Germany and European defence. By Ulrike Esther Franke
Why Europe needs a recovery plan for strategic autonomy. By Ulrike Esther Franke & Jana Puglierin
The limits of “no, no, no”: Why the Dutch are so ambivalent about Europe. By Caroline de Gruyter
The unwavering European: Spain and its place in Europe. By Laia Mestres
Will Poland be an enfant terrible of the post-Brexit EU? By Adam Balcer -
Can Europe create strong energy and climate coalitions? By Marin Lessenski
Italy in the EU: shared priorities, provocative politics. By Federico Solfrini
Austria’s toughest EU presidency. By Sofia Maria Satanakis
Hungary for more: Viktor Orbán’s new European battles. By Zsuzsanna Végh
Can Slovakia and the Czech Republic overcome Europe’s east-west divide? By Almut Möller & Milan Nič
Cherry-picking Europe: Migration and economic management in Malta. By Daniel Mainwaring
Dutch courage: Is the Netherlands overconfident in its EU influence? By Josef Janning
A networked Union: in search of power couples. By Christoph Klavehn
Wall in: Eurosceptic challenge in Croatia. By Robin-Ivan Capar
Belgium's integration blues. By Simon Desplanque
Latvia's controlled discontents. By Karlis Bukovskis
Romania ahead of the EU presidency. By Luka Orešković
True North: Finland's commitment to the European project. By Almut Möller
Loss adjustment: European politics realigns for Brexit. By Josef Janning
Living on the edge: Could Bulgaria ally with the Visegrád Group? By Daniel Stefanov
Slovenia’s Greta Garbo syndrome. By Marko Lovec
Rome alone? Italy’s weak coalition networks. By Almut Möller
Brothers in arms: Poland and Hungary seek to transform the EU. By Josef Janning
Podcast: Close contact? Coalition building in the EU with Christoph Klavehn, Josef Janning, Mark Leonard, and Almut Möller
Czechs and balances: Can Berlin shake up the Visegrád group? By Almut Möller
Portugal: A good European in search of friends. By Almut Möller
The overconfident new president: Austria’s coalition-building challenges. By Josef Janning
The roots of coalitions: Like-mindedness among EU member states. By Josef Janning
The “more Europe” core four. By Josef Janning
Migration dominates EU priorities through 2023. By Josef Janning
The end of Angst: Germany is ready to lead in Europe. By Josef Janning
German-Dutch relationship key to EU coalition building. By Christel Zunneberg
EU Coalition Explorer – Der interaktive Datenatlas
An interconnected outlier: the unaccounted costs of Brexit. By Christoph Klavehn
What are the dynamics between EU heavyweights in the face of Brexit? By Christel Zunneberg
We are grateful to the countless experts and policy professionals who took the time to answer our questionnaires and share their expertise and insights on European affairs. For their support and contributions to the Policy Intentions Special, we thank ECFR’s associate researchers: Adam Balcer, Vladimir Bartovic, Karlis Bukovskis, Robin-Ivan Capar, Léonard Colomba-Petteng, Simon Desplanque, Björn Fägersten, Lívia Franco, Andrew Gilmore, Tuomas Iso-Markku, Marin Lessenski, Marko Lovec, Radu Magdin, Daniel Mainwaring, Laia Mestres, Justinas Mickus, Matej Navrátil, Christine Nissen, Ylva Petterson, Martin Quencez, Jonas Richter, Sofia-Maria Satanakis, Hüseyin Silman, Federico Solfrini, Cassiopée Thuin, George Tzogopoulos, Niels van Willigen, Viljar Veebel and Zsuzsanna Végh. We also thank Christoph Klavehn, Loran Lifshits, and Christoph Maurer for helping us make sense of and visualise the data. Finally, we thank our colleagues at ECFR for their helpful comments and suggestions on the project and Sophie Rau and Stiftung Mercator for their enduring support of ECFR and Rethink: Europe.
To contact the project team please email [email protected].