British, French and German leaders in particular seem to expend a huge amount of energy trying to out do each other on China, rather than working together to extract maximum benefit for Europe (and consequently their own national economies) from China's rise. And in confrontations with China, EU leaders more often than not undermine each other's positions rather than support them (e.g. on Arms Embargo, Market Economy Status, human rights, and Taiwan).
European leaders do however find common ground when it comes to global, rather than bilateral, issues. Britain, France and Germany have consistently presented a united front to China on Iran nuclear and as a result have secured significant movement from a Chinese Government that would otherwise have probably not supported UN Security Council action. The same is true on Sudan-Darfur. So why isn't this the case when dealing with China's impact on the EU's fundamental economic and political interests?
One of the main achievements of President Sarkozy's visit to China in November 2007 was contracts for $17.4 billion worth of Airbus planes. This benefits the UK, Germany and Spain (where Airbus planes are made) as much as France, but there was no mention of this during Sarkozy or Prime Minister Brown's visit.
Next time he sees China's leaders, I would urge the Prime Minister (and other European leaders) to take European business leaders with him; to encourage an ambitious trade and investment target between Europe and China; to lobby for the opening up of Chinese markets that benefit European businesses; to support the EU-China economic dialogue (rather than create a parallel UK-China one); to work with President Sarkozy to re-energise the EU-China Partnership on Climate Change (rather than both the UK and France creating bilateral ones); to commit £50 million to EU energy efficiency, renewable energy, clean coal and carbon capture and storage technology transfer (for example via the proposed EU-China Clean Energy Centre); and to support Chancellor Merkel's values-based approach to China and robust line on human rights.
Last year China hosted most of the 50 African heads of state for a China-Africa summit. Maybe it's time for European leaders to forge a common approach to China and go there together to get some real business done.
|
|
Tweet |
How Europe can promote democracy in Azerbaijan
Hollande and Merkel should launch an ambitious EU reform programme
Why the emerging special relationship matters for Europe
How will Taiwan’s relationship with China evolve?
Europe should take a more assertive approach to political reform in Jordan
China is facing a choice between regress and reform
Europe can help Burma reform, but its help must be gradual
An end to the bloodshed may necessitate talks with the regime
Putin's return: why Europe should prepare for a weaker Putin
The thinking behind Germany's unpopular approach to the crisis
How well did European foreign policy perform over the last year?
Sebastian Dullien is quoted in an article on the euro crisis
ECFR's policy brief on China and Germany is discussed
Thomas Klau quoted on Hollande's foreign policy, icluding policy towards Poland
In an interview, Thomas König talks about China and Europe ralations
1 Comments
John Fox is right on target in demanding that EU should speak with a common voice when dealing with China.
I would like to add that EU might draw some lessons from U.S. approach to China in late 60s to late 70s. USA achieved vast diplomatic successes by tying together some carefully selected economic and political issues and using some issues important to China as a leverage to achieve deals in an other issue very important to USA.
The use of one issue as a negotiation leverage to achieve e.g. human rights or democracy progress in China would be very welcome, not to even mention EU companies getting more access to China’s domestic markets.
To sum up, it is not enough to speak with a common voice - EU needs also to select the issues it wishes to negotiate very carefully so it can use the leverage tactic most beneficially.