Why should we care about Ukraine?
It's Friday, my first day in Kiev but also the last day of campaigning for this first round of voting. According to Ukrainian law the politicians have to stop talking at midnight, giving everybody a much-needed rest.
The law also bans Ukrainians from publishing opinion polls in the last two weeks of the campaign, but everyone is talkign about a possible rogue poll by the Russian agency VTsIOM. It gives Viktor Yanukovych, whose supporters rigged the last presidential election in 2004, a dramatic comeback story with 30.5% of the vote. The prime minister, Yuliya Tymoshenko, has only 13.9%, and has been overtaken by a dark-horse candidate Serhiy Tyhipko on 14.4%. Rogue poll or not - and certainly few people here believe it - a similar result after Sunday's voting would see Tymoshenko sensationally knocked out, with the other two going through to the second round.
I'll give a few pointers of what to watch out for over the weekend, but for now I'll focus on that fundamental question: 'Why should anyone else care about the outcome of these elections?'
Ukraine is a reminder that there are many "Europes" over and above EU Europe. There is geographical Europe, UEFA Europe and Eurovision Europe. The EU Europe and Ukraine have an important but dysfunctional relationship. Even many of Ukraine's traditional friends, such as Poland or the Baltic States, suffer from ‘Ukraine fatigue', thanks to the increasing policy paralysis in Kiev. Many in Ukraine suffer from ‘Europe fatigue'. Ukraine feels that the EU is constantly telling it "now is not the time", either for a membership application or any form of deeper relationship.
Whoever wins this election, it is obvious that EU-Ukraine relations need a 'reset'. The EU-Ukraine summit in December 2009 showed that no one is happy with the current situation. A functioning Ukraine, which can deliver on its own policy reform promises, could transform the region and EU-Russia relations. The upcoming election may also result in a still-malfunctioning Ukraine, which may benefit a resurgent Russia, but not the EU.
In Part One of Ukraine Decides, Andrew looks at what went wrong after 2004's Orange Revolution. You can read Part One here
You can listen to a podcast interview with Andrew Wilson talking about the elections here. You can also subscribe to ECFR podcasts via iTunes or podhoster.com.
Andrew Wilson is available for press interviews and comment on the elections. Click here for our press advisory.
|
|
Tweet |
How well did European foreign policy perform over the last year?
From a major exporter of goods to a major exporter of capital
To Chongqing or Guangdong? China’s big development decision
Instead of lecturing Ukraine the EU must show that it means business
Algeria is at risk of turmoil without EU-backed reform
Learning to deal with a changing Russia under a familiar leader
What price will Europe pay for China's help in rescuing the euro?
The impossible is also necessary if the euro and Europe are to be saved
Spain's election, caught between the euro crisis and Arab revolutions
The EU's role in building accountable societies in North Africa
Building sustainable EU military power at a time of defence cuts
London's BCM on Taiwan is discussed by Focus Taiwan
Ulrike Guérot is interviewed about Germany as a Bric
In his blog Vladimir Milov praises ECFR Russia work and "Post-BRIC Russia" report
Blogactiv reviews ECFR’s Scorecard 2012
Comments
There are no comments for this entry yet. Get the discussion started and post below.