The European Council on Foreign Relations

Ossetia farce

(English translation)

The signing by President Medvedev of the decree recognising the self-proclaimed independence of South Ossetia and Abkhazia is the definitive confirmation that the conflict which occurred this August has been carefully orchestrated from Moscow, with the aim of amputating both territories from Georgia. It amounts to a reprisal long since announced, the price to pay for the independence of Kosovo proclaimed in February of this year. Since then, the Russian authorities have been piling the pressure on Tbilisi, encouraging the local Ossetia militias to harass Georgian troops, increasing their own military presence in the two enclaves and handing out Russian passports wherever they go.

There has been intense debate about who began hostilities on August 9th, but that is now rendered pretty much redundant; including Abkhazia into the bargain manifestly shows that Moscow is not even interested in arguing its case. For those who insist Kosovo is a precedent, events in the last few days ought to be taken as conclusive proof that the two cases are located at the antipodes of international law. Medvedev's decree equates ten years of a United Nations mandate in Kosovo with ten days of Russian occupation, and with the utmost cynicism, unjustifiably and unilaterally settles the matter, making it nothing other than pure and simple annexation.

Russia wanted to clearly show who is in charge of the borders of the former Soviet Union. In a rehashing of the Monroe Doctrine, its troops now move around the territory of a member of the OSCE and Council of Europe, an ally and partner of the EU, USA and NATO, with complete impunity. A country with a clear democratic outlook, enjoying rapid growth, and one which is strategically crucial for Europe from an energy point of view, Georgia has been made to pay a very heavy price by Russia for daring to be the Cuba of the Caucasus. Those who believed, in the case of Chechnya, that Russia would be content to act with impunity within its own borders were wrong. The lesson has not gone unnoticed in Ukraine, which could easily lose Crimea if it continues to insist in moving on the Russian fleet from there.

With the proclamation of independence, Russia has dangerously raised the stakes of its anti-western rebellion, leaving NATO and its plans to grant prospective membership to Georgia and Ukraine in its December Summit this year in an impossible position. NATO will have to come up with an answer to the difficult question of whether the security guarantee enshrined by article 5 of the Treaty applies to all of Georgia, or only to the dismembered version; in the former case, it would amount to a casus belli with Russia, and in the latter, a macabre joke. In just a few days, the entire European order has been badly shaken. Consequences will be far-reaching.

Translated by Douglas Wilson


Farsa Osetia

(El Pais, 27 August 2008)

La firma por el Presidente Medvedev del decreto de reconocimiento de la autoproclamada independencia de Osetia del Sur y de Abjazia supone la confirmación definitiva de que el conflicto habido este mes de agosto ha sido minuciosamente orquestado desde Moscú con el fin de amputar a Georgia estos dos territorios. Se trata de una represalia anunciada a costa de la independencia de Kosovo, proclamada en febrero de este año. Desde entonces, las autoridades rusas han estado intensificando la presión sobre Tblisi, animando a las milicias osetias a hostigar a las tropas georgianas, incrementando su presencia militar en las dos regiones y concediendo pasaportes rusos por doquier.

Aunque ha habido un intenso debate acerca de quién comenzó las hostilidades el 9 de agosto, ese debate pierde ahora bastante sentido: la inclusión de Abjazia en el mismo lote demuestra a las claras que Moscú ni siquiera tiene interés en apoyar su posición en argumentos. Para los que insisten en el precedente de Kosovo, lo ocurrido estos días debería ser la prueba definitiva de que estos dos casos están en las antípodas del derecho internacional. El decreto de Medvedev iguala los diez años de mandato de Naciones Unidas en Kosovo con diez días de ocupación rusa y, en el colmo del cinismo, resuelve el caso unilateral e injustificadamente con lo que no es sino una pura y llana anexión.

Rusia ha querido demostrar claramente quién manda en las antiguas fronteras de la URSS. En una reedición de la Doctrina Monroe, sus tropas se pasean ahora impunemente por el territorio de un estado miembro de la OSCE y del Consejo de Europa, de un socio y amigo de la UE, EEUU y la OTAN. Rusia ha hecho pagar cara a Georgia, una democracia con vocación occidental, en rápido crecimiento económico y estratégicamente crucial para Europa desde el punto de vista energético, la osadía de ser la Cuba del Cáucaso. Quienes en el caso de Chechenia pensaron que Rusia se contentaría con reclamar la impunidad dentro de sus fronteras estaban equivocados. La lección no ha pasado desapercibida en Ucrania, que fácilmente podrá perder Crimea si sigue obstinándose en desalojar de allí a la flota rusa.

Con la proclamación de la independencia, Rusia escala peligrosamente en su rebeldía anti-occidental y pone en una posición imposible a la OTAN, que tenía previsto conceder una perspectiva de adhesión a Georgia y a Ucrania en su cumbre de diciembre de este año. La OTAN tendrá que responder a la difícil pregunta de si la garantía de seguridad que implica el artículo 5 del Tratado se aplica a toda Georgia o sólo a la Georgia amputada: en el primer caso, se trataría de un casus belli con Rusia, en el segundo, de un chiste macabro. En unos pocos días, todo el orden europeo ha sido sacudido. Las consecuencias serán de gran alcance.


1 Comments

#1

Europe?s leading human rights and security body, the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe, accused the Georgian government of committing likely war crimes in the Georgian rebel region of South Ossetia, Der Spiegel said in a report published on Monday 1st September 2008. The Vienna-based OSCE massively criticized Georgia?s western- backed leadership for its assault on South Ossetia, saying Tbilisi planned the invasion well in advance.

According OSCE report by Spiegel there is at least four interesting facts which mainstream Western media now must swallow:

  * First, the article presents evidence showing how Georgia prepared military actions against South Ossetia before the event transpired,
  * Second, it demonstrates how Georgia attacked South Ossetia before Russian tanks even entered the Roki tunnel,
  * Third, the article includes testimonies from observers who say Tbilisi ordered an attack on South Ossetia at night while innocent civilians were sleeping,
  * Forth Spiegel writes that reports by OSCE observers point to possible military crimes, committed by Georgian troops in South Ossetia.

Same time when Spiegel published it?s cover story the EU?s Brussels summit agreed to condemn Russia?s ?inappropriate response? and declared Russia?s recognition of the dissident regions of Abkhazia and South Ossetia was ?contrary to international law?. The EU summit also stated that any solution to the conflict must ?rest on respect for independence, sovereignty and territorial integrity?and not on unilateral facts, which contradict international law?.

These remarks of EU summit are sounding a bit familiar to me. Exactly ? the words above are almost same which Russia was using about Kosovo case. Then EU and USA were talking something about ?absolutely unique ? sui generis - case?, which is no precedent. What a double standards and hypocrisy I must say.

Ari Rusila | Jyv?skyl?, Finland | 06 Sep 08, 06 Sep 08 EST | www

Submit a Comment

Your message will be submitted to a moderator before appearing online. Name and email address are required, all other fields are optional. Your email will not be displayed.

Please enter the word you see in the image below:

Remember my personal information

Latest Publications

The EU and Azerbaijan: Beyond Oil

How Europe can promote democracy in Azerbaijan

How France and Germany can make Europe work

Hollande and Merkel should launch an ambitious EU reform programme

China and Germany: a new special relationship?

Why the emerging special relationship matters for Europe

China Analysis: Taiwan after the election

How will Taiwan’s relationship with China evolve? 

Jordan: Reform before it’s too late

Europe should take a more assertive approach to political reform in Jordan

China at the crossroads: are the reformers winning the argument?

China is facing a choice between regress and reform

How the EU can support reform in Burma

Europe can help Burma reform, but its help must be gradual

Syria: Towards a Political Solution

An end to the bloodshed may necessitate talks with the regime

The end of the Putin consensus

Putin's return: why Europe should prepare for a weaker Putin

The long shadow of ordoliberalism: Germany's approach to the euro crisis

The thinking behind Germany's unpopular approach to the crisis

European Foreign Policy Scorecard 2012

How well did European foreign policy perform over the last year?

Reinvention of Europe

In the Press

Los Angeles Times
23 May 12

Sebastian Dullien is quoted in an article on the euro crisis

Presseurop
22 May 12

ECFR's policy brief on China and Germany is discussed

Rzeczpospolita
22 May 12

Thomas Klau quoted on Hollande's foreign policy, icluding policy towards Poland

TO BHMA
22 May 12

In an interview, Thomas König talks about China and Europe ralations

Read more press >

Publications side bar