Everyone acknowledges that winning "hearts and minds" in the Muslim world will be key to defeating Jihadist terrorism. Yet Europe - while well-placed to do so and with vast funds being spent by the EU-27 individually - has yet to make public diplomacy a core component of its external relations. Far from being the proverbial mouse that roars, the EU more resembles an elephant that squeaks.
The West must find a way to build bridges to Muslims while simultaneously discrediting Osama bin Laden and other Islamic terrorist organizations from the Muslim masses. As Lee Hamilton, the vice chairman of the 9/11 Commission, said: "We need to join the battle of ideas within the Islamic world, communicating hope instead of despair, progress in place of persecution, life instead of death."
In part, this will require a change in policy. At the same time, we need to neutralize anti-Western sentiment among Muslim populations. The best way forward, in the short-term, may therefore be to promote greater cultural ties and links between ordinary citizens in the West and the Islamic world.
Europe is well-placed to lead this work. In a BBC World Service survey of nearly 40,000 people in 33 nations across the globe, every country had a predominantly positive view of Europe. As Philip Fiske de Gouveia, a Public Diplmacy expert, points out: "The EU's actions - the pursuit of multilateralism, the establishment of the International Criminal Court, the championing of the rule of law and human rights in its neighbourhood - have been of great benefit to its reputation globally."
Though smaller than the United States, Britain and France each spend about the same as the United States on public diplomacy. France has the highest per capita spending on international cultural relations at $17 per head. Many member states run broadcasting companies - a key strategic public diplomacy tool - like the BBC World Service, Deutsche Welle and France 24. And the EU, for its part, has ensured that the Euro-Mediterranean Partnership has a Public Diplomacy dimension. Many European countries also support the UN-sponsored Alliance of Civilizations.
But, as a report by the Foreign Policy Centre noted, "the way that Europe and the EU communicate with third-country publics has been atomized and disjointed." EU-27 efforts are nationally-focused and often competitive. DG Communication, in charge of communications inside the European Commission, has no real involvement in the EU's external relations. DG RELEX - the Commission's mini-Foreign Ministry - spent €7 million on communications in 2005 through its bilateral delegations. But this is a small figure compared to, for example, the British Council's £551 million annual turn-over.
Big EC delegations in Washington and Moscow employ several Public Diplomacy professionals, but far fewer work in Tehran, Sanaa and Cairo. And there is no established communications cadre within the Commission ready to deploy abroad in support of EU priorities.
More people work on Public Diplomacy in the Foreign Office in London - near 70 - than in Brussels. Other DGs - like Enlargement and Development - spend money on communications. But here, too, the effort falls short and is disjointed. Despite being the first major donor to react to the 2005 Tsunami, the EU received little credit.
Since 2006 efforts have been underway to improve the EU's approach. But to make real progress, as part of the new European External Action Service (EEAS) - to be established in January 2009 when the Lisbon Treaty comes into force - the EU should establish an equivalent of the British Council, an Alliance European. Such an organisation could gather all the EU's cultural diplomacy efforts, coordinate EU country efforts and boost the EU's engagement in the Middle East. New funds are needed for cultural exchanges, university scholarships, and similar activities. These should compliment national programmes, not seek to replace them.
Inside the new EEAS, a cadre of public diplomacy professionals should be hired. Each new EU delegation should have not only a Cultural Attachés, working to the Alliance European, but a team of communication specialists. In Brussels, an Alistair Campbell-type chief needs to assume charge and direct Public Diplomacy efforts. Crucially, the on-going process to develop the EU's budget must make resources for such an effort available.
Boosting the EU's cultural and public diplomacy activities must be a key part of the EU's post-Lisbon set-up if Europe is to play a serious role in the struggle against extremism in the Middle East. Even those member states, like Britain, who are usually sceptical of additional European responsibilities ought to see the strategic benefit of a collective effort.
The latest issue of China Analysis looks at Beijing’s willingness to strengthen international economic governance, and its authors argue that much thinking in China seems to focus on the short term
The authors of the latest issue of China Analysis argue that Western concerns over “Chindia” - the emergence of a Sino-Indian economic power bloc or strategic alliance - may be unwarranted.
Europe has the US president it wished for, but does Barack Obama have the strong transatlantic partner he wants?
Have broken promises and treating Afghanistan, DR Congo and Iraq like Bosnia left the EU without the capacity to prevent fragile states from becoming failing states?
ECFR publishes a collection of views from key Russian intellectuals.
The EU’s ongoing loss of influence at the UN is putting lives at risk, argues the author of ECFR’s latest paper.
Fears in Europe that China works to lock the US into a “G2” embrace so as to dominate the global agenda do not reflect Chinese experts’ current strategic thinking.
Is a complacent strategy that focuses on gradual change rather than crises losing the EU its battle with Russia for influence in the eastern neighbourhood?
The EU has an opportunity to influence President Obama’s efforts to reform US counterterrorism policy
China is exploiting the EU’s divisions and treating the 27-state bloc with “diplomatic contempt” on issues ranging from trade to the Dalai Lama.
Will the military surge in Afghanistan fail without a civilian surge?
With the pivotal change of leadership in Washington, the US and the EU may have an ideal moment to strengthen the US-EU institutional bond.
Could building a single European market in natural gas be the most effective strategy for the European Union in countering Russia’s divisive energy diplomacy?
In a joint research project with FRIDE, ECFR looks at the EU’s record in Azerbaijan, Belarus, Ukraine, Jordan, Lebanon and Morocco.
The EU’s leverage to promote human rights through the UN has dramatically declined over the last decade, our exclusive report reveals.
This authors analyse the background and developments in the Russia-Georgia conflict and outline recommendations on how to prevent wider political fallout.
European governments cannot afford to move at the speed of the slowest, argues Nick Witney, and should push for a ‘multi-speed’ Europe on ESDP
A piece on the EU and Ukraine, quoting Wilson and Popescu’s recent report.
Korski: “The Anglo-American strategy in Afghanistan has hit an absolute low mark.”
Daniel Korski on what lies ahead for Baroness Ashton.
Comments for this entry are closed.
Dear Mr Korski,
Could you provide the weblinks to the reports you mention in the following quote:
But, as a report by the Foreign Policy Centre noted, “the way that Europe and the EU communicate with third-country publics has been atomized and disjointed.”
Thanks in advance
Sincerely
T. Weidenbach
Dear Traude,
Here it is: http://fpc.org.uk/fsblob/657.pdf
But you may also find the following interesting:
http://www.clingendael.nl/publications/2006/20060900_cdsp_paper_dip_c.pdf
http://www.clingendael.nl/publications/2005/20050800_cli_paper_dip_issue99.pdf
Cheers
Daniel
Daniel et al.,
Another report you might like to quote is by Dov Lynch is here http://www.epc.eu/en/pub.asp?TYP=TEWN&LV;=187&see;=y&t;=7&PG;=TEWN/EN/detailpub&l;=12&AI;=509 , a good analysis, that goes in the direction you propose, although I can’t say I agree with all the conclusions. Dov points out that, besides the RELEX 7 million which you mention, the Commission does have all the cultural exchanges, university scholarships and so on, which may partially account for the “predominantly positive view of Europe” to which you refer, but that, like many things in the Commission, it is not wrapped in a neat package.
Regards
David Ringrose
Head of information, DG External Relations, European Commission