The European Council on Foreign Relations

France's Shakespearean defence review

By Nick Witney - 08 Feb 08


There are two sure signs that France's defence review ( the "livre blanc" exercise) is entering its end-game: a new imprecision has crept into forecasts of when the outcome will be published ("spring"); and interesting disclosures are beginning to appear.

Thus through Le Monde we learn that the head of the French army has warned against ‘pauperising' his service (by implication, to fund the inflated equipment aspirations of Navy and Air Force); the Defence Minister pre-emptively declares that that manpower numbers must come down by 30,000 over the next 5 years; and Le Figaro splashes the leaked contents of the overall strategic analysis submitted last month to President Sarkozy by the supervising Commission.

‘Much Ado about Nothing' sniffs one leading blogger: Sarkozy insists on ‘no taboos', but what scope for any ‘break with the past' if it is already determined that France will retain deployable, professional armed forces, backed with a nuclear deterrent, operating through NATO and the EU, and funded from about 2% of GDP?

In truth, it seems that France's defence establishment is rediscovering the iron law that defence reviews may start by being about policy, but end by being about money. To students (or indeed veterans) of Britain's own Strategic Defence Review of 1998, there is more than a hint of ‘déjà vu'. A new government comes to power, recognises that it has inherited an unaffordable defence programme and, full of vigour and confidence, is determined to achieve a new balance through trenchant policy analysis and bold decision-making. Real cut-backs in capability will if necessary be made, determined on the basis of strategic priorities rather than vested interest; but their extent will be limited by a ruthless drive to eliminate waste and duplication in the infrastructure of defence. Thus the manpower cuts are to be achieved through out-sourcing of support functions, leaving the ‘front line' untouched; Ministry of Defence and the separate Service HQs are to be brought together on a new site in the Paris suburbs; anything that the three Services currently do separately, such as training helicopter pilots, will be up for amalgamation; and the network of bases and establishments, at home and overseas, will be radically pruned. Defence, declares the President, should not be treated as an instrument of regional policy.

The trouble, of course, is that the regions are where most of France's voters and Deputies are to be found. So, too, the industries and jobs that depend on the plethora of major new equipment programmes (big air-lifters, air-to-air refuellers, armoured vehicles, nuclear-powered attack submarines, transport and attack helicopters, a second aircraft carrier, new-generation frigates - the list goes on) which the French Defence Minister calculated at the outset to be 40% unaffordable.

It is here, in the dense undergrowth of possible cuts and rationalisations, that the final, often fratricidal, stages of the review will be fought out - with occasional eruptions aimed at so shocking the rest of government that more money is wrung out of the Finance Ministry, ballooning public deficit or no. Much ado about quite a lot, in fact.

That British experience of 10 years ago provides grounds for hope. The Strategic Defence Review was generally judged a success, and restored a degree of equilibrium to defence finances for a number of years. Alas, nothing is forever; and the irony is that Britain's own defence effort is now every bit as insolvent as that of France, only with no chance of the government acknowledging the fact this side of the next election. The hard truth is that, for second-rank powers such as Britain and France, it is simply no longer affordable to sustain comprehensive defence capabilities on a strictly national basis.

Which takes us back to the bard. Much Ado about Nothing is the story of Beatrice and Benedick - a couple clearly, to everyone but them, destined for each other. But, each fiercely independent, they waste years talking past each other, mistiming their mutual approaches, indulging in unhelpful flirtations elsewhere, and generally delighting in sticking fingers in each other's psychological wounds. Sounds familiar? For the two Bs, it was at last a case of All's Well that Ends Well. For Britain and France, the drama is not yet played out. But each new tryst offers hope - and President Sarkozy's upcoming state visit to the UK could be a more than usually auspicious moment.

 


3 Comments

#1

This is spot-on! Britain and France need to work more closely together to build up their capabilities, which fall year on year?while those of rising powers elsewhere grow alarmingly…

But they must also bring in Germany, Spain and Italy, whose defence spending is appallingly low. Britain and France should not alone be responsible for the European Union’s security and defence?nor with the ‘teeth’ which are needed to provide its foreign policy with any credibility or bite.

The time has come for the British and French leaders to work together on defence. No two powers are so similar in their capabilities or international positions. It just makes sense.

James Rogers | Cambridge, United Kingdom | 08 Feb 08, 08 Feb 08 EST | www
#2

So, if I understand correctly the author, the question is : how do we get from “Much Ado about nothing” to “the taming of the schrew” ?

Robert RANQUET | PARIS | 08 Feb 08, 08 Feb 08 EST
#3

I agree with both these comments. Britain and France between them account for less than half the total of European defence spending—there is so much more that Europe could do if the will can be generated to re-direct spending to useful capabilities (helicopters, not combat aircraft), and then use them.
As for how to re-inforce Franco-British cooperation—I plan to offer some thoughts on what the upcoming summit could/should deliver in the next few days. All ideas gratefully received!

nick witney | paris | 12 Feb 08, 12 Feb 08 EST

Submit a Comment

Your message will be submitted to a moderator before appearing online. Name and email address are required, all other fields are optional. Your email will not be displayed.

Please enter the word you see in the image below:

Remember my personal information

Latest Publications

European Foreign Policy Scorecard 2012

How well did European foreign policy perform over the last year?

China Analysis: Facing the risks of the 'going out strategy'

From a major exporter of goods to a major exporter of capital

China Analysis: One or two Chinese models?

To Chongqing or Guangdong? China’s big development decision

Ukraine after the Tymoshenko verdict

Instead of lecturing Ukraine the EU must show that it means business

A 'reset' with Algeria: the Russia to the EU's south

Algeria is at risk of turmoil without EU-backed reform

Dealing with a post-BRIC Russia

Learning to deal with a changing Russia under a familiar leader

Rescuing the euro: what is China’s price?

What price will Europe pay for China's help in rescuing the euro?

Four scenarios for the reinvention of Europe

The impossible is also necessary if the euro and Europe are to be saved

Spain after the elections: the 'Germany of the south'?

Spain's election, caught between the euro crisis and Arab revolutions

Europe and the Arab revolutions: a new vision for democracy and human rights

The EU's role in building accountable societies in North Africa

How to stop the demilitarisation of Europe

Building sustainable EU military power at a time of defence cuts

Reinvention of Europe

In the Press

Focus Taiwan
08 Feb 12

London's BCM on Taiwan is discussed by Focus Taiwan

Il Foglio
08 Feb 12

Ulrike Guérot is interviewed about Germany as a Bric

Vladimir Milov
07 Feb 12

In his blog Vladimir Milov praises ECFR Russia work and "Post-BRIC Russia" report

Blogactiv
07 Feb 12

Blogactiv reviews ECFR’s Scorecard 2012

Read more press >

Publications side bar