The European Council on Foreign Relations

Coalitions of the weaklings

By Richard Gowan - 23 Jul 10

Battered by the economic crisis and bogged down in Afghanistan, European governments seem to be turning their back on foreign and security issues. Germany proposes to cut its defence budget by €9 billion. The new British government rejects notions of an “ethical foreign policy”, urging diplomats to embrace a “new commercialism” overseas instead.

Having previously talked up Europe’s global role, EU members now emphasise their weaknesses. Before the downturn, the Union approved non-essential military missions to places like the Congo and Chad, in part just to show that it could. It’s hard to imagine the EU Council signing off on similar operations in the next few years – or maybe ever.

But if Europeans suddenly feel weak, they’re not alone. U.S. policy journals are full of articles about national decline. A chunk of the American publication industry is devoted to churning out books with titles like “How Empires End”.  Defense Secretary Robert Gates has questioned the sustainability – and necessity – of current military spending.

Russia, having trumpeted its new strength after the 2008 Georgian war, looks diminished. Shaken by fluctuations in energy prices, President Medvedev and Prime Minister Putin are making nice to the West. Moscow’s response to the Kyrgyz crisis seemed positively European, involving a lot of multilateral consultations but no forceful intervention.

What of the rising powers? China and India are trying to increase their military reach across Asia. But as China expert Andrew Small points out in the current Washington Quarterly, Beijing fears that getting too deeply involved in stabilising Afghanistan would exacerbate tensions among its own Muslim minorities “or simply make China a frontline target for Islamic militants.”  And as the Financial Times noted in an analysis last week, India is struggling to assert itself even among neighbors like Nepal and Sri Lanka.

Taking a long view, it’s clear that China and India are in a very different position to the EU’s members.  All the rising powers are increasing defence spending rapidly, while European military cost-cutting will likely continue well beyond the immediate downturn.

But for now, we are in a moment when everyone looks weak. If the U.S. and its NATO allies are wary of projecting power, the big emerging economies still have limited reach.

In some ways, this is rather nice. Great power confrontations are not impossible, but are still relatively improbable. Yet this era of weakness also bring risks. The most obvious are in the Middle East.  With the U.S. gradually pulling back from the region, a breakdown in Iraq or spillover of violence from Afghanistan could create endemic instability. Israel, uncertain of American support, has become increasingly hawkish.

State failures and civil wars will continue to bubble from Sudan to Central Asia. If the Afghan experience has convinced many Europeans that interventionism is foolish, ignoring these crises is dangerous. Remember why we went into Afghanistan in 2001.

Containing new crises will be difficult. Instead of Bush-era “coalitions of the willing”, it may be necessary to form “coalitions of the weaklings”: groups of states that can’t handle international problems alone, but have sufficient leverage between them to do something.

In June, Germany and Russia proposed a new EU-Russia Security Committee – and said it should find ways to resolve the frozen conflict in Moldova. Less than two years after the EU and Moscow fell out over Kosovo and Georgia, this shows how both sides’ awareness of their weaknesses may boost security cooperation. Similarly, Russia’s sense of vulnerability has arguably helped ease diplomacy over Iran’s nuclear program.

Structuring coalitions to deal with complex issues like Afghanistan is horribly hard. Yet the EU’s leaders need to recognise that weakness isn’t an excuse for inaction – it should be a stimulus for more activist diplomacy to resolve actual and potential crises now.  As powers like China and India grow stronger, there will be fewer opportunities to parlay.

This piece was first published by Global Europe.


1 Comments

#1

The Middle East is a region of opportunities for the EU in terms of political influence for the common good.
The peace treaty being negotiated at present will, if it is at all implemented, remain extremely fragile. I suggest that a society of peoples will have the chance of greater longevity for peace.
My blog (http://bit.ly/bGgbmH) suggests an EU-style “Levantine Union” for the whole region. The EU has had 60 years of proven development and improvement of its own system, and should be in a position of supporting such an initiative in the Levant. It would achieve peacec in the region and perhaps gratitude for Europe.

Nick (Klaus) Veltjens | near Melbourne Australia | 16 Nov 10, 16 Nov 10 EST | www

Submit a Comment

Your message will be submitted to a moderator before appearing online. Name and email address are required, all other fields are optional. Your email will not be displayed.

Please enter the word you see in the image below:

Remember my personal information

Latest Publications

European Foreign Policy Scorecard 2012

How well did European foreign policy perform over the last year?

China Analysis: Facing the risks of the 'going out strategy'

From a major exporter of goods to a major exporter of capital

China Analysis: One or two Chinese models?

To Chongqing or Guangdong? China’s big development decision

Ukraine after the Tymoshenko verdict

Instead of lecturing Ukraine the EU must show that it means business

A 'reset' with Algeria: the Russia to the EU's south

Algeria is at risk of turmoil without EU-backed reform

Dealing with a post-BRIC Russia

Learning to deal with a changing Russia under a familiar leader

Rescuing the euro: what is China’s price?

What price will Europe pay for China's help in rescuing the euro?

Four scenarios for the reinvention of Europe

The impossible is also necessary if the euro and Europe are to be saved

Spain after the elections: the 'Germany of the south'?

Spain's election, caught between the euro crisis and Arab revolutions

Europe and the Arab revolutions: a new vision for democracy and human rights

The EU's role in building accountable societies in North Africa

How to stop the demilitarisation of Europe

Building sustainable EU military power at a time of defence cuts

Reinvention of Europe

In the Press

France Culture
09 Feb 12

Justin Vaïsse gives an Analysis of US presidential elections

Spravy Pravda
09 Feb 12

Spravy Pravda reviews ECFR's European Foreign Policy Scorecard 2012

Financial Times
09 Feb 12

Ulrike Guérot comments on Germany and Europe

Internazionale
09 Feb 12

José Ignacio Torreblanca pens an article on EU and no-nation States

Read more press >

Publications side bar