After weeks of horse-trading for candidates for the two future top EU
positions, the new President and the new Foreign Minister, the two names,
Hermann van Rompuy and Cathy Ashton, have provoked European-wide bafflement.
Years to get an important new treaty, intended to allow
But van Rompuy and Ashton might actually be good choices. Yes, they are
unknown and do not convey strong opinions or visions for
Cathy Ashton may not know much about the Middle East or
History shows that the world produces and gets the people it needs. There is
no doubt that
|
|
Tweet |
How well did European foreign policy perform over the last year?
From a major exporter of goods to a major exporter of capital
To Chongqing or Guangdong? China’s big development decision
Instead of lecturing Ukraine the EU must show that it means business
Algeria is at risk of turmoil without EU-backed reform
Learning to deal with a changing Russia under a familiar leader
What price will Europe pay for China's help in rescuing the euro?
The impossible is also necessary if the euro and Europe are to be saved
Spain's election, caught between the euro crisis and Arab revolutions
The EU's role in building accountable societies in North Africa
Building sustainable EU military power at a time of defence cuts
London's BCM on Taiwan is discussed by Focus Taiwan
Ulrike Guérot is interviewed about Germany as a Bric
In his blog Vladimir Milov praises ECFR Russia work and "Post-BRIC Russia" report
Blogactiv reviews ECFR’s Scorecard 2012
2 Comments
Dear Madam,
I am afraid you comment is a very good example of an apologetic approach to European affairs process which, in my opinion, very often taints the field of European integration studies. Yes, the choice of Mr. van Rompuy and Ms. Ashton can be interpreted as a result of underlying structural factors, and it does probably convey a fairly realistic picture of the ‘state of the (European) Union’.
However, none of these findings should obscure the fact that our European leaders had an excellent chance to push things forward and make some intelligent use of the opportunites provided by the Lisbon Treaty… and they failed.
What the European Union needed was not necessarily Tony Blair, nor should political “sex appeal” be a determining requirement for the jobs of the European Council chair and the new EU “foreign minister”. But what the EU certainly needs are political leaders who command respect - both outside Europe but, equally importantly, within. If the EU is to be here not just for its member states but also for the people, it must have representatives to whom the European citizens can relate. And that, I am afraid, is not the case with either of the two selected candidates. That’s why, in this respect as in many others, the choice the European Council made yesterday is a bad one.
Sincerely,
Tomas Karasek
Dear Ulrike Guerot,
its far-sighted to balance the views about 2 new European leaders. In fact history has proved that so called “Nobodys” (see SPIEGEL ONLINE about the new leadership) contribute in signifcant ways. Not only for europe last decades…
Nurturing important consensus building procedere in a highly complex European situation -within a global context! -can be an asset.
Thank you for this special take here at ECFR and thank you for your work at the Berlin Bureau in special.
Very best, from Berlin
Albert Klamt