In ECFR's latest report, we call on European leaders to renew their commitment to Afghanistan's reconstruction, to boost troop numbers, and to support Afghan-led negotiations with the Taliban.
Across Europe, the increasing unpopularity of the Afghan intervention has sapped governments' commitment to pursuing the war and reconstruction. The European Commission's reconstruction assistance is set to fall from an average of 200 million per year to 150 million euros - little more than Canada's contribution. And the operational restrictions imposed on European forces have severely hampered NATO's ability to fight the insurgency.
Afghanistan is not lost. Working with the Afghan government, Europe can help turn the tide. But it will require a new approach.
Since the hundreds of thousands of troops required for a traditional stabilisation mission will never be available, it is all the more important that the troops we do have are used flexibly and that deficiencies in key areas are addressed.
We believe that Europe should send more troops and remove many of the restrictions limiting their operational effectiveness. In particular, more European trainers for the Afghan army and police are needed.
Meanwhile, the United States needs recast its counter-insurgency strategy -- putting the population's security first, minimizing civilian casualties, and re-doubling efforts to persuade individual Taliban commanders to defect to the government's side.
What Europe has should have learnt from its experience of warfare, negotiations with the Taliban are now unavoidable and we must help the Karzai government convince them that peace is more profitable than war. To succeed in Afghanistan, both war and words are needed and Europe needs to be able to do both.
Click here to read the full report "Afghanistan: Europe's Forgotten War".
|
|
Tweet |
How well did European foreign policy perform over the last year?
From a major exporter of goods to a major exporter of capital
To Chongqing or Guangdong? China’s big development decision
Instead of lecturing Ukraine the EU must show that it means business
Algeria is at risk of turmoil without EU-backed reform
Learning to deal with a changing Russia under a familiar leader
What price will Europe pay for China's help in rescuing the euro?
The impossible is also necessary if the euro and Europe are to be saved
Spain's election, caught between the euro crisis and Arab revolutions
The EU's role in building accountable societies in North Africa
Building sustainable EU military power at a time of defence cuts
Regards Citoyens cover our Scorecard 2012
Armenia's News.am discusses the Nagorno-Karabakh dispute's appearance in the Scorecard
El Pais has written a blog on the Scorecard
Global Dashboard discusses the Foreign Policu Scorecard
1 Comments
I think the new ECFR Report on Afghanistan is spot on, as is Mr. Korski’s commentary.
In order to defeat the insurgency, we HAVE to get the general population on our side - and the way to do that is to help fulfill their basic needs, not make their lives tougher and more dangerous.
Repurposing the troops to more training and “peace-keeping” roles A) puts them out of danger, B) takes away the insurgency’s “fuel” and C) helps Afghanistan take permanent steps towards change, as opposed to endlessly and randomly putting out fires as they come up. The goal is to END the conflict, not prolong it (naturally weapons manufacturers would disagree).
This is the first promising suggestion I’ve seen in a long time, and the compromise offered to both the EU and the US seems a reasonable one. One can only hope our leaders read this new report, and give it some consideration.