Status quo in Afghanistan is untenable
After six-and-a-half years of war and the biggest NATO operation in history, Afghanistan remains in the throes of insurgency and President Hamid Karzai's government is perilously weak. There is little prospect of a swift victory; even the most optimistic assessments point to the necessity of a long-term international presence.
In ECFR's latest report, we call on European leaders to renew their commitment to Afghanistan's reconstruction, to boost troop numbers, and to support Afghan-led negotiations with the Taliban.
Across Europe, the increasing unpopularity of the Afghan intervention has sapped governments' commitment to pursuing the war and reconstruction. The European Commission's reconstruction assistance is set to fall from an average of 200 million per year to 150 million euros - little more than Canada's contribution. And the operational restrictions imposed on European forces have severely hampered NATO's ability to fight the insurgency.
Afghanistan is not lost. Working with the Afghan government, Europe can help turn the tide. But it will require a new approach.
Since the hundreds of thousands of troops required for a traditional stabilisation mission will never be available, it is all the more important that the troops we do have are used flexibly and that deficiencies in key areas are addressed.
We believe that Europe should send more troops and remove many of the restrictions limiting their operational effectiveness. In particular, more European trainers for the Afghan army and police are needed.
Meanwhile, the United States needs recast its counter-insurgency strategy -- putting the population's security first, minimizing civilian casualties, and re-doubling efforts to persuade individual Taliban commanders to defect to the government's side.
What Europe has should have learnt from its experience of warfare, negotiations with the Taliban are now unavoidable and we must help the Karzai government convince them that peace is more profitable than war. To succeed in Afghanistan, both war and words are needed and Europe needs to be able to do both.
Click here to read the full report "Afghanistan: Europe's Forgotten War".
Latest Publications
China shapes its post-crisis economic agenda
The latest issue of China Analysis looks at Beijing’s willingness to strengthen international economic governance, and its authors argue that much thinking in China seems to focus on the short term
China and India: rivals always, partners sometimes
The authors of the latest issue of China Analysis argue that Western concerns over “Chindia” - the emergence of a Sino-Indian economic power bloc or strategic alliance - may be unwarranted.
Towards a post-American Europe: A Power Audit of EU-US Relations by Nick Witney & Jeremy Shapiro
Europe has the US president it wished for, but does Barack Obama have the strong transatlantic partner he wants?
Can the EU rebuild failing states? A review of Europe’s civilian capacities.
Have broken promises and treating Afghanistan, DR Congo and Iraq like Bosnia left the EU without the capacity to prevent fragile states from becoming failing states?
What does Russia think?
ECFR publishes a collection of views from key Russian intellectuals.
The EU and human rights at the UN: 2009 annual review
The EU’s ongoing loss of influence at the UN is putting lives at risk, argues the author of ECFR’s latest paper.
China’s response to the G2
Fears in Europe that China works to lock the US into a “G2” embrace so as to dominate the global agenda do not reflect Chinese experts’ current strategic thinking.
European and Russian power in the troubled neighbourhood
Is a complacent strategy that focuses on gradual change rather than crises losing the EU its battle with Russia for influence in the eastern neighbourhood?
Beyond the “War on Terror”
The EU has an opportunity to influence President Obama’s efforts to reform US counterterrorism policy
A Power Audit of EU-China Relations
China is exploiting the EU’s divisions and treating the 27-state bloc with “diplomatic contempt” on issues ranging from trade to the Dalai Lama.
Shaping Europe's Afghan Surge
Will the military surge in Afghanistan fail without a civilian surge?
Re-wiring the US-EU relationship
With the pivotal change of leadership in Washington, the US and the EU may have an ideal moment to strengthen the US-EU institutional bond.
Beyond dependence: How to deal with Russian gas
Could building a single European market in natural gas be the most effective strategy for the European Union in countering Russia’s divisive energy diplomacy?
Promoting democracy abroad - the EU's record
In a joint research project with FRIDE, ECFR looks at the EU’s record in Azerbaijan, Belarus, Ukraine, Jordan, Lebanon and Morocco.
Is the EU a global force for human rights?
The EU’s leverage to promote human rights through the UN has dramatically declined over the last decade, our exclusive report reveals.
Can the EU win the peace in Georgia?
This authors analyse the background and developments in the Russia-Georgia conflict and outline recommendations on how to prevent wider political fallout.
Re-energising Europe's Security and Defence Policy
European governments cannot afford to move at the speed of the slowest, argues Nick Witney, and should push for a ‘multi-speed’ Europe on ESDP
In the Press
The Kyiv Post - 11 Mar 10
A piece on the EU and Ukraine, quoting Wilson and Popescu’s recent report.
The Prague Post - 10 Mar 10
Korski: “The Anglo-American strategy in Afghanistan has hit an absolute low mark.”
Reuters - 08 Mar 10
Daniel Korski on what lies ahead for Baroness Ashton.
Home |
About |
Council |
Experts |
Publications |
RSS |
Newsroom |
Email sign-up |
Contact
1 Comments
I think the new ECFR Report on Afghanistan is spot on, as is Mr. Korski’s commentary.
In order to defeat the insurgency, we HAVE to get the general population on our side - and the way to do that is to help fulfill their basic needs, not make their lives tougher and more dangerous.
Repurposing the troops to more training and “peace-keeping” roles A) puts them out of danger, B) takes away the insurgency’s “fuel” and C) helps Afghanistan take permanent steps towards change, as opposed to endlessly and randomly putting out fires as they come up. The goal is to END the conflict, not prolong it (naturally weapons manufacturers would disagree).
This is the first promising suggestion I’ve seen in a long time, and the compromise offered to both the EU and the US seems a reasonable one. One can only hope our leaders read this new report, and give it some consideration.