A couple of days ago I recorded an audio podcast with Dimitar Bechev (here's the podcast; here's the blog post) looking at Ankara's delicate positioning over international intervention in Libya.
I've just been reading a piece in Today's Zaman by Gülnur Aybet (a friend of ECFR's) that contributes significantly to the debate - the piece (in English) is here and well worth reading. Dr Aybet argues that the Libyan intervention will probably be remembered as ambivalent and reluctant, despite wide international backing, largely because of the recent historical reverberations from Iraq. This ambivalence and reluctance has affected many of the actors, from the Arab League to the US, but is especially keenly felt in Turkey.
Turkey is of course a curious case - a member of NATO, frustrated with (and humiliated by) the tortuous accession process into the EU, yet carving out its own niche as
How Europe can promote democracy in Azerbaijan
Hollande and Merkel should launch an ambitious EU reform programme
Why the emerging special relationship matters for Europe
How will Taiwan’s relationship with China evolve?
Europe should take a more assertive approach to political reform in Jordan
China is facing a choice between regress and reform
Europe can help Burma reform, but its help must be gradual
An end to the bloodshed may necessitate talks with the regime
Putin's return: why Europe should prepare for a weaker Putin
The thinking behind Germany's unpopular approach to the crisis
