The European Council on Foreign Relations

€ view: Bundesbank - tactical gains but a strategic defeat

The past week looked like another brilliant victory for the German Bundesbank, defending its staunch principles of orthodox monetary policy against the challenges from the rest of the world. Already at the euro summit at the end of October, the Bundesbank had gotten its way when the German chancellor Angela Merkel stroke down the French idea to give the EFSF a bank license to borrow money from the ECB so that it could increase its firepower and buy more government debt from euro-countries under pressure, such as Spain or Italy. Now, quoting its legal task of safe-guarding the German foreign exchange reserves (a task in many other countries regularly performed by the Finance Ministry), the Bundesbank managed to shoot down the idea discussed at the G20 meeting in Cannes that European countries could use their special drawing rights at the IMF to leverage the EFSF.

Of course, judging from a democratic legitimacy perspective, the Bundesbank may have a point. If national governments cannot convince their national parliaments to increase the volume of the EFSF directly and hence take up more risks for national budgets, it seems not completely honest to use the special drawing rights. In the end, putting SDR into the EFSF would increase the contributing countries’ exposures, just as increasing the European countries’ guarantees for the EFSF. For the governments it seems the easier way as usually, parliaments do not have to vote on the use of SDRs and the public might not understand the technicalities involved here.

Yet, it is fair to assume that the Bundesbank is not that much concerned with legitimacy and transparency. In Germany, there is a long history of not publicly criticizing the Bundesbank, with occasional stories of the Bundesbank censoring critical journalists by cutting them off vital information (at least as reported privately by journalists).

Instead, the Bundesbank seems to be much more concerned with the monetary policy consequences of using special drawing rights for leveraging the EFSF capital. In its eyes, the discussed EFSF-SDR construction de facto means an indirect financing of government debt through the ECB. This is seen as another step away from orthodox monetary policy making and the separation of monetary and fiscal policy the Germans are so keen on.

However, the tactical victories of the Bundesbank of the past weeks might turn out to have moved it further towards a strategic defeat in the end. The Bundesbank has now shot down two ways which would have been possible for effectively leveraging the EFSF and hence giving it at least a chance of successfully battling the sovereign debt crisis in Europe. With one option after another disappearing, the euro area is moving closer to the point at which only one policy will be able to keep the currency union from breaking apart: the large-scale direct purchase of government bonds by the ECB and a guarantee from the central bank that yields on government bonds will not be allowed to increase above a certain threshold.

When the euro area arrives at this point, both further perceivable developments look unfavorable for the Bundesbank: If the majority at the ECB council then decides to do what is necessary and vote down the German opposition in the council, the Bundesbank has clearly and openly lost its months-long fight against the ECB’s bond purchases.

If, on the other hand, the ECB does not decide in time on large purchases of government bonds and the euro area actually breaks apart with an exit of countries such as Italy and possibly France, the legacy of the Bundesbank will be seriously damaged. A break-up of the euro-area has the potential to become the economically worst turmoil for Europe since the Great Depression with unpredictable political consequences. While in the short run this might leave the Bundesbank with its own currency and the power to set its own interest rate again, the backlash against the institution might be enormous. Historians then will judge the Bundesbank’s performance in the current crisis at par with the Federal Reserve’s performance in the late 1920s (which is nowadays almost anonymously seen to be one of the reasons for the Great Depression). Under such a scenario, even the Germans might at some point turn against their beloved Bundesbank. And the Bundesbank might not be quite as immune to public pressure as the ECB: while the ECB’s independence is protected by the EU Treaty and can only be altered by unanimous treaty change, the Bundesbank’s independence is only guarded by a simple German law which can be changed at any moment with a simple majority in the German Bundestag.

 

2 comments

Tromyth 26th March 2012 at 08:03pm

it is using clearly point that it suhlod be slashing interest rates and buying up covered bonds and corporate bonds to get inflation expectations and employment higher. If that doesn’t work it suhlod buy every single piece of corporate paper and introduce negative interest rates on reserves and if that doesn’t work either, Draghi it could even hold the next ECB conference from Christiania, CPH, where dressed in a hawaian shirt and holding a marijuana pipe he announces that the ECB will fly helicopters throwing cash at random times and places and will continue doing so until inflation expectations start rising to levels consistent with its mandate. This is not an option that the ECB might or might not pursue, it is the ECBs job. There are plenty of policies that the ECB can pursue to make sure that 1. and 2. above are always true. THAT would give them credibility, because if us, market participants, knew that the ECB will stick to its mandate no matter what, we would carry out its mandate for it. If we knew that the ECB will buy up corporate bonds to pursue full employment, we would buy them ourselves because anything else would lose us money. The ECB and Draghi wouldn’t have to put on hawaian shirts or even lift a finger. If we trusted that the ECB would stick to its mandate (all of it, not just the inflation bit) we would bid up corporate bonds and crush the lending costs of european corporations without the ECB having to take on any credit risk.  But no, the ECB has decided to ignore half its mandate and then come out and say we are credible, inflation 2%, INFLATION 2% I TELLS YA!!! . Well, If we have a deal that I will not kick you or punch you and when I see you I start punching you while screaming I AM CREDIBLE, I AM NOT KICKING , I am not credible, period. The ECB has done a bunch of scary things lately. It has effectively told us, market participants that it don’t give a damn about its mandate, and will only honor the part of the mandate that the Germans and the French want it to honor (i.e. full deflation course and buying up the stuff that the ballance sheets of BNP and SocGen are stuffed with). Moreover, the fact that the rate cut was not unanimous shows that the ECB has voting members that either don’t get monetary economics or that they get monetary economics but they will ignore it anyway. This is scary stuff. So no, most market participants, myself included, won’t be buying corporate bonds or do anything that our NK toy models tell us to do. The ECB has decided to ignore economics and so will I. I think this is a much better explanation of the reaction of the market, it’s not about right wing or left wing but about the ECB deciding to ignore half their mandate and thinking that they can get away with it as long as they keep yelling that they didn’t ignore the other half.  And since I learned to trade on a Copenhagen trading floor, I imagine this interpretation suhlod be pretty consistent with what you hear from my ex-colleagues over there.Bottom line, the NK models that we used in order to determine investment decisions no longer apply for the euro zone. They still apply for Sweden because we know the Riksbank will stick to its mandate and reintroduce negative interest rates if things go south, they still apply for the BoE because we know that they will buy up every single gild out there as long as the risks of deflation are higher than the risks of inflation, but the fact remains that the ECB cannot be trusted anymore that they will stick to their mandate, they are simply doing what the Germans and the French want. Moreover, half the ecb’s board wouldn’t pass econ 101. Let me just ask, professor, if you asked your students what suhlod the central bank do in the face of a huge output gap and inflation expectations around 1-1.5% and they responded that interest rates suhlod not be lowered, like the ECB dissenters did, would you give them a passing grade?

Übersetzung 3rd April 2012 at 11:04am

The ECB has decided to ignore economics and so will I. I think this is a much better explanation of the reaction of the market, it’s not about right wing or left wing but about the ECB deciding to ignore half their mandate and thinking that they can get away with it as long as they keep yelling that they didn’t ignore the other half.

Submit a comment

Your message will be submitted to a moderator before appearing online. Name and email address are required, all other fields are optional. Your email will not be displayed.

Name:

Email:

Location:

URL:

Please enter the word you see in the image below:

Remember my personal information

Latest Publications

The EU and Azerbaijan: Beyond Oil

How Europe can promote democracy in Azerbaijan

How France and Germany can make Europe work

Hollande and Merkel should launch an ambitious EU reform programme

China and Germany: a new special relationship?

Why the emerging special relationship matters for Europe

China Analysis: Taiwan after the election

How will Taiwan’s relationship with China evolve? 

Jordan: Reform before it’s too late

Europe should take a more assertive approach to political reform in Jordan

China at the crossroads: are the reformers winning the argument?

China is facing a choice between regress and reform

How the EU can support reform in Burma

Europe can help Burma reform, but its help must be gradual

Syria: Towards a Political Solution

An end to the bloodshed may necessitate talks with the regime

The end of the Putin consensus

Putin's return: why Europe should prepare for a weaker Putin

The long shadow of ordoliberalism: Germany's approach to the euro crisis

The thinking behind Germany's unpopular approach to the crisis